PT-017 - FLUOXETINE RESPONSE ASSOCIATED WITH ENANTIOMER ABUNDANCE IN ADOLESCENTS.
Wednesday, May 28, 2025
5:00 PM - 6:30 PM East Coast USA Time
J. Tumberger1,2, M. Bartkoski3, I. Choi4, P. Lee4, W. Brooks4, J. Leeder3, S. Stancil3,2,5; 1Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA, 2University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA, 3Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA, 4University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA, 5University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Medical Student Children's Mercy Kansas City Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Background: Only 3 in 5 adolescents respond to antidepressants the first time. Identifying individual factors that influence response can guide treatment and expedite recovery. Our prior work demonstrated a strong correlation between brain and plasma fluoxetine (FLX) concentrations; however, no relationship between brain or plasma concentrations and response was detected. FLX is administered in racemic form (S and R) and bio-transformed into the primary metabolite, norfluoxetine (norFLX). The S-enantiomer of norFLX is ~20 times more active than the R-enantiomer and thought to contribute meaningfully to drug response. CYP2D6 is a highly polymorphic enzyme partially responsible for the stereospecific metabolism of FLX to norFLX. The S-enantiomer of norFLX has higher affinity for CYP2D6, suggesting the potential accumulation of S-Norflu as CYP2D6 activity decreases. This pilot study evaluated the relative abundance of FLX and norFLX S and R enantiomers as a potential contributor to response. Methods: Youth aged 12-21 yr on FLX at steady state had plasma FLX and norFLX S/R measured by UPLC-MSMS and CYP2D6 genotyped by Illumina array with ddPCR copy number confirmation. Participants with PHQ9 scores ≥ 11 or Promis Anxiety t-scores ≥ 50 were considered non-responders. Descriptive statistics, Spearman’s rho (rs) and Cohen’s d (d) were performed in JMP v17 software. Results: In 56 youth (16±1.9 yr (12-21 yr), 70% female), average norFLX S/R was higher in responders compared to non-responders (depression: 1.34±0.84 vs 0.84±0.45, p= 0.001, Cohen's d=0.73; anxiety: 1.56±0.98 vs 0.97±0.55, p=0.006, Cohen's d=0.74). Participant symptom scores were also negatively correlated with norFLX S/R (depression rs = -0.28; anxiety rs = -0.34), while FLX S/R was not associated with depression or anxiety response. Mean norFLX S/R was similar across CYP2D6 phenotypes (PM n=2, IM n=11, NM n=36, UM n=3). Conclusion: In adolescents on FLX, norFLX S/R was significantly higher in responders compared to non-responders. No difference was detected in norFLX S/R across CYP2D6 phenotypes, a finding limited by a small sample size and is likely related to autoinhibition of CYP2D6 activity resulting in FLX-associated phenoconversion to poor metabolizer status in all participants. Further research is needed to evaluate the role of norFLX S/R as a predictor of FLX response.